The Future of Meat — and the future of Meatpaper

August 23, 2013

image by Marie Assénat
Meatpaper Twenty — the Future of Meat issue — will start shipping next week. It will also be our last issue. We are so grateful you have joined us!

It is with mixed feelings that we announce our final issue. It has been an amazing, inspiring, seven-year journey. We may reappear in another form at some point, but our plans are still coalescing. Our back issue store will remain open so you can supplement your Meatpaper libraries. If you are a current subscriber, you will be hearing from us about your subscription.

As we were contemplating the final issue, we thought it would be appropriate to leave you with the future.

We invited a few of our favorite thinkers — Bruce German, Michael Pollan, Hank Shaw, Charles Mann, Kara Nielsen, Kirk Lombard, and more — to gaze into a crystal ball with us and talk about the future of meat. We asked some of our favorite illustrators and contributors to give us their own meat futures.

What they gave us: Pumped-up cows. Bucolic chickens. Futures filled with fake meat, wild meat, tiny meat, trendy meat, lab meat, insect meat, utopian meat, business meat, moral meat, political meat, fantastical meat. We tried to cram it all in: utopia, dystopia, and everything in between.

Don’t miss this historic final issue! Order your copy of Meatpaper 20 and some back issues today.

Dear readers, subscribers, contributors, retailers, advertisers, event sponsors, and other Meatpaper enthusiasts: We thank you for all your support over the years, and for being a part of this lively and timely conversation.


About Meatpaper:

Meatpaper, an independent quarterly print journal covering art and ideas about meat, launched in 2007. Neither promoting nor condemning carnivorism, Meatpaper was founded in response to the recent groundswell of interest in the ethics, aesthetics, and cultural significance of meat. Meatpaper articles are from many different angles: reported journalism, profiles of people who spend their lives working with meat, anthropology, personal narrative, coverage of artists who use meat as subject or material, and poetry. Each issue features original art, photography, and editorial illustrations.

All cultures have customs and taboos associated with the eating of animals, and our belief has been that examining these attitudes toward meat in an unbiased forum can illuminate larger cultural issues. We have been deeply committed to independent journalism. Meatpaper came into being not to prescribe dietary choices, but to facilitate one of the more important conversations of our time.

Meatpaper has received numerous honors, including awards from San Francisco magazine, Library Journal, and Print, as well as several Utne Independent Press Award nominations. Meatpaper has appeared in exhibitions at the Walker Art Center, Cooper-Hewitt, and other institutions.

Meatpaper Twenty — the Future of Meat issue — is also the last issue. It will arrive at stores and in subscribers’ hands in late August and early September.

Author: | Filed under: Uncategorized

You are invited to a Fishue celebration

February 6, 2013

Please note: the Fishue Party has sold out. Thank you for your enthusiastic response! Due to the size of the venue, there will not be tickets available at the door.

Please join us at Ramen Shop for a celebration of Meatpaper Issue 19, the Fishue! We have gathered an incredible group of chefs from Ramen Shop, Chez Panisse, ICHI Sushi, Fish, and more to feed you. We look forward to seeing you at this very special event.

WHAT
Meatpaper’s Fishue party and fundraiser
Food, drink, and demonstrations

WHEN
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
7 pm – 10 pm

WHERE
Ramen Shop
5812 College Avenue, Oakland, CA

PARTIAL SPONSOR LIST
Sam White, Jerry Jaksich, Rayneil De Guzman (Ramen Shop)
Jerome Waag (Chez Panisse)
Susan Kim & Andrew Pimlott (KimPim) and Julie Kahn
Tim Archuleta (ICHI Sushi)
Doug Bernstein (Fish)

21st Amendment Brewery
Trumer Pils
Scribe Winery

Music by The Barbary Ghosts

Seafood generously provided by TwoXSea

Paper fish art by Anandamayi Arnold

TICKETS
$45
Purchase tickets here

Author: | Filed under: Meatpaper events, News from Meatpaper HQ

Holiday at the Abbatoir: The rise and fall of slaughterhouse tourism in America

September 15, 2009

Story by Heather Smith
This article originally appeared in Meatpaper Issue Nine.

WHEN THE BRITISH AUTHOR RUDYARD KIPLING visited America in 1899, he went to Yosemite. Then he went to Yellowstone. Then he went to a slaughterhouse. “They say every Englishman goes to the Chicago stock-yards,” Kipling wrote. “Once he sees it he will not soon forget it.”

He wasn’t the only one. In the early 1900s, 200,000 people visited Armour’s main plant in a single year, among them women’s clubs, church societies, domestic science classes, trained nurses, journalists, scientists, and house-wives’ leagues. When the journalist Upton Sinclair set out to write The Jungle, all the investigative prowess he needed to get inside a slaughterhouse was to sign up for a tour group. Sinclair’s book shook up the industry and led to the Meat Inspection Act of 1906, but, according to Roger Horowitz, author of the excellent social history Putting Meat on the American Table, the tours didn’t halt until mid-century. Why? Horowitz was kind enough to answer a few of our burning questions about slaughterhouse tourism.

So, when did these tours start?

The earliest tours we see referred to are in the 1870s. The completion of the Transcontinental Railroad, the invention of the refrigerated railroad car, and a certain amount of political dealmaking were causing the slaughterhouses to consolidate like they never had before. And there was a sense that letting people see what goes on inside the slaughterhouse was good for business.

Meatpacking plants would publish pamphlets bragging about how modern and hygienic their facilities were. Visitors would walk right out onto the killing floor and see workers covered in blood, and to us today it wouldn’t look clean, but it was clean compared to what had been going on 10 years earlier, when local butchers would just throw entrails right out into the street.

This is the beginning of industrialization. A lot of the industrial economy in the Midwest prior to World War II was devoted to transforming commodities into food: wheat into flour, corn into cornflakes, cows into steaks. There was this sense among people that this is what America is good at. If you want to see American industrialization at its peak, go to a slaughterhouse.

 

“Then the same merciful Providence that has showered good things on my path throughout sent me an embodiment of the city of Chicago, so that I might remember it forever. Women come sometimes to see the slaughter, as they would come to see the slaughter of men. And there entered that vermillion hall a young woman of large mould, with brilliantly scarlet lips, and heavy eye brows, and dark hair that came in a widow’s peak on the forehead. She was well and healthy and alive and she was dressed in flaming red and black and her feet were cast in red leather shoes. She stood in a patch of sunlight, the red blood under her shoes, the vivid carcasses stacked around her, a bullock bleeding its life away not six feet away from her, and the death-factory roaring all around her. She looked curiously, with hard, bold eyes, and was not ashamed.”

— Rudyard Kipling

Is it true that Henry Ford got the inspiration for the assembly line on one of these tours?

He said so in his autobiography. The conveyor belt system was a huge innovation in the slaughterhouses — instead of moving around, the men stood in one place, and the work came to them.

 

In your book, you mention that a lot of women worked in slaughterhouses, too. What did they do?

The jobs they took were less dangerous, but also had much lower pay. They appeared with the rise of processed meat in the 1880s and 1890s. Meat is deeply ingrained in American culture, going back to the colonial period. It’s a symbol of American prosperity — Americans could always eat more meat than the Europeans. It was part of democracy to be able to afford meat.

Meanwhile, organ meats are a good source of protein, but in America they were always the meat of the poor. So these companies were born that turned organ meats into something else before they reached the consumer. No more tongue. Now there was only Spam. And these are the jobs that women took.

Interestingly enough, when sliced-bacon departments were created in the 1910s, they were created in part as a site for tourism. They would glass-in the walls and hire only white, native-born women for that department. There’s no blood with bacon. It’s cured and dried and cut already, so it looks really clean. It was a sign of the changing nature of the tours — this increasing idea that slaughterhouses should actually look clean and bloodless.

 

So jobs were divided by ethnicity as well?

The sausage departments were full of immigrant women. There’s a quote in one of Armour’s guides about how the Norse work in refrigeration because they’re adapted to working in the cold, and the Americans are the killers, because killing takes the most skill. The worst jobs went to African Americans — rendering, curing hides.

The subtext in how these slaughterhouses were presented on tour was “There are no black hands touching the meat.” But of course there were all kinds of black hands touching the meat — that was just happening in other parts of the slaughterhouse.

 

What happened? Why did the tours come to an end?

They closed down for World War II and never reopened. Trucking began to replace the railroad, and they moved the slaughterhouses out to the prairie, where they were closer to the cattle, as opposed to closer to the customer. And the culture had changed. Public sentiment had turned against them.

 

Is it hard to get that kind of access these days?

I’ve been on plenty of slaughterhouse tours, and they rarely take you onto the killing floor, even if you’re vetted and approved. They’ll just say,  “You don’t want to see that.” The one time I made it to the killing floor, I was brought through on a union tour. It was at a poultry plant. And it was disturbing. One minute an animal was alive, the next it was dead. The moment of death is a metaphysical experience. At the time, I thought of how Upton Sinclair described it: “Like some crime, buried out of sight and memory.”

 

Why do you think these tours were so popular?

What is intriguing in descriptions of slaughterhouse tours is the reactions of people going through. There’s a little of that amusement park horror. It’s the same impulse that pushes people to see scary movies. People would go, see their gore. And then they would go home and eat a steak.


HEATHER SMITH is an editor at Meatpaper.